skip navigationpage head and navigational links ADA publications enforcement site map search


"For the Department of Justice, turning the promise of the Olmstead decision into a reality for individuals with disabilities across the nation has become a major component of ADA enforcement."

photo of Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez
Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez

red envelop image Sign Up for E-mail Updates
Receive notifications by E-mail when new Olmstead litigation information is available.

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GUIDE

A technical assistance guide created to assist individuals in understanding their rights and public entities in under- standing their obligations under the ADA and Olmstead.

Statement of the Department of Justice on Enforcement of the Integration Mandate of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Actand Olmstead v. L.C.

Olmstead: Community Integration for Everyone

Image of USA map In 2009, the Civil Rights Division launched an aggressive effort to enforce the Supreme Court's decision in Olmstead v. L.C., a ruling that requires states to eliminate unnecessary segregation of persons with disabilities and to ensure that persons with disabilities receive services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. President Obama issued a proclamation launching the "Year of Community Living," and has directed the Administration to redouble enforcement efforts. The Division has responded by working with state and local governments officials, disability rights groups and attorneys around the country, and with representatives of the Department of Health and Human Services, to fashion an effective, nationwide program to enforce the integration mandate of the Department's regulation implementing title II of the ADA.

What's New?

ILADD v. DHS – 13-CV-01300 – (E.D. IL 2013) - On April 15, 2013, the United States filed a Statement of Interest in ILADD v. Quinn. Plaintiffs seek a preliminary injunction to stop the planned closure of two state-run centers for people with developmental disabilities. Read more

T.H. et al. v. Dudek et al., 0:12-cv-60460 (S.D. Fla. 2013)
On April 10, 2013, the United States filed a Statement of Interest opposing Florida officials' Motion to Dismiss, and in support of plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification.  The plaintiffs' complaint alleges that the State of Florida unnecessarily institutionalizes Medicaid-eligible children who are medically fragile in nursing facilities, or places them at risk of institutionalization, by limiting access to medically necessary services in the community, in violation of the ADA, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment ("EPSDT") provisions of the Medicaid Act.  The complaint also alleges that Florida has violated the Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review ("PASRR") provisions of the Nursing Home Reform Amendments to the Medicaid Act by failing to fully evaluate children before admitting them to nursing facilities.  The United States previously filed a Statement of Interest opposing a prior motion to dismiss in June 2012. Read More

Lane v. Kitzhaber – 12-CV-00138 – (D. OR 2012) On March 27, 2013, the United States filed a Motion to Intervene in a pending class action lawsuit against the State of Oregon. The United States' accompanying Complaint in Intervention alleges violations of Title II of the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act for unnecessarily segregating individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in sheltered workshops when they could be served in integrated employment settings. Read more

Amanda D. v. Wood Hassan, 1:12-CV-53-LM (D. N.H. 2012) (formerly Lynn E. v. Lynch)
The Justice Department intervened in Amanda D. v. Wood Hassan, a lawsuit alleging that the state of New Hampshire fails to provide mental health services to people with disabilities in community settings in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Read more

Hunter v. Cook, 1:08-cv-02930-TWT (N.D. Ga. 2013)
The United States filed a Statement of Interest in Hunter v. Cook, in opposition to the state of Georgia's argument that serious risk of institutionalization is not a viable claim under Title II of the ADA. Read More

More What's New


ADA.gov | Civil Rights Division

last updated April 15, 2013